{"id":11105,"date":"2016-02-05T17:55:19","date_gmt":"2016-02-05T17:55:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/?p=11105"},"modified":"2016-02-06T15:44:30","modified_gmt":"2016-02-06T15:44:30","slug":"blogathon-0516-mankad-out-not-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/?p=11105","title":{"rendered":"Blogathon 05\/16: Mankad. Out! Not Out!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The controversy known as &#8216;Mankading&#8217; has raised its head in First Class cricket once again.<\/p>\n<p>The name &#8216;Mankad&#8217; originates from Vinoo Mankad, the Indian left arm bowler\/opening batsman.<\/p>\n<p>In the 1947\/48 Australian tour of India, Vinoo Mankad ran out the non-striking batshman Bill Brown, by breaking the wicket at the non-striker&#8217;s end during his run-up, while Bill Brown was out of his ground.<\/p>\n<p>Although seen as &#8216;unsporting&#8217;, Vinoo&#8217;s tactic was perfectly within the Rules of Cricket, at that time.<\/p>\n<p>Vinoo Mankad had some form on this tactic.<\/p>\n<p>He had previously dismissed the obviously hard of learning Bill Brown, in another match, against an Australian XI earlier in the tour.<\/p>\n<p>The latest &#8216;Mankad&#8217; controversy has arisen in an Under 19 Cricket World Cup match, between West Indies and Zimbabwe.<\/p>\n<p>Keemo Paul was bowling for the WI, while at the non-striker&#8217;s end was Zimbabwe&#8217;s Richard Ngarava.<\/p>\n<p>On his run up, Keemo Paul saw that Richard Ngarava was out of his ground, so he broke the non-striker&#8217;s wicket and appealed for a dismissal.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a frame capture of the incident:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-11107\" src=\"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Mankad.jpg\" alt=\"Mankad\" width=\"700\" height=\"394\" srcset=\"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Mankad.jpg 700w, https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Mankad-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Mankad-250x141.jpg 250w, https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Mankad-150x84.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Before we look at the rules of cricket, we need to understand that there are more than one set of rules to the sport.<\/p>\n<p>The underpinning set of rules are the MCC Laws of Cricket and it is this set of rules that I&#8217;ll concentrate on first of all.<\/p>\n<p>The Laws of Cricket apply worldwide*, and were first codified over 250 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>The MCC Laws of Cricket are updated annually; the updates are published in an official publication.<\/p>\n<p>In the 2016 edition (I have my copy close at hand) Law 42 (Fair and Unfair Play) refers, in general, to the practice known as &#8216;Mankading&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>In particular Law 42.15 says:<br \/>\nThe bowler is permitted, before entering his delivery stride, to attempt to run out the non-striker.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll skip the rest of Law 42.15, because we already have the crucial wording:<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The bowler is permitted, before entering his delivery stride, to attempt to run out the non-striker&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>So the question is, had Keemo Paul legally attempted to dismiss Richard Ngarava?<\/p>\n<p>As the still shot plainly shows, Paul was well in to his run-up, but he clearly had not entered his delivery stride.<\/p>\n<p>So it was a legal attempt at dismissal, as defined in the MCCs Laws of Cricket.<\/p>\n<p>Was Richard Ngarava right to have been judged out?<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s a tough call.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that at the moment that Keemo Paul broke the non-striking batsman&#8217;s wickets, Richard Ngarava&#8217;s bat was actually on the line of the popping crease.<\/p>\n<p>Which, in my view, should have led to a &#8216;not out&#8217; decision.<\/p>\n<p>But cricket, like all sports, is a lot easier from the comfort of one&#8217;s own front room.<\/p>\n<p>*except where local and\/or tournament or competition regulations apply, where such regulations may introduce variations to the MCC Laws of Cricket<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The controversy known as &#8216;Mankading&#8217; has raised its head in First Class cricket once again. The name &#8216;Mankad&#8217; originates from Vinoo Mankad, the Indian left<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stuff","two-columns"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}