{"id":6244,"date":"2011-12-24T19:23:46","date_gmt":"2011-12-24T19:23:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/?p=6244"},"modified":"2011-12-24T22:22:05","modified_gmt":"2011-12-24T22:22:05","slug":"i-unfollowed-you-because","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/?p=6244","title":{"rendered":"I unfollowed you because&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dear Twitter Friend.<\/p>\n<p>I have been following you for a while now.\u00a0It&#8217;s important to understand that I only follow people who I like; I only follow people who have &#8216;a voice&#8217; that I consider to be &#8216;a good read&#8217; at the time I check them out, before following. In a nutshell, I follow people who display an interesting personality in 140-characters. Because that, in itself, is a challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, though, as much as I did enjoy reading your &#8216;voice&#8217; at the outset, I have now had to unfollow you.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of coming back to me to ask why I&#8217;ve unfollowed you (and let&#8217;s face it, that&#8217;s a really weird thing for you to do),\u00a0I&#8217;ve produced this handy, cut-out-and-keep guide that lists the most likely reasons.<\/p>\n<p>I hope this information is helpful to you:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1. You engaged on one\u00a0over-long\u00a0rant too many<\/strong><br \/>\nTwitter has a 140-character limit for a reason. Due to, presumably, insanity on your part, you have, in the past, tried to work around that limit by producing a series of tweets. So let me give you a heads-up. A 23-tweet, 2,510-character, 423-word rant about *anything at all* is unacceptable. There is no excuse for this behaviour at all. I strongly advise you to get a Facebook page, or a blog, and dump your rant there. Then, once you&#8217;re proof-read and corrected the content, you could put out just one tweet that linked to it. How about that as an acceptable solution? And if you do have a Facebook page and\/or a blog and no-one reads it, just sit back for a few minutes and ask yourself why that might be?<\/p>\n<p>Or&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. You are guilty of the *repeated* use of incorrect grammar<\/strong><br \/>\nLook, neither the word\u00a0Tory&#8217;s, nor the word Torys are acceptable substitutes for the word Tories. The latter is correct, by the way, the first two are completely, unacceptably wrong. This *repeated* abuse of English is a crime of ignorance. Wake up! If you can&#8217;t live by the rules of the English language, you should move to another country, one where they speak a language which you are capable of using correctly.<\/p>\n<p>Or&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. You are guilty of *repeatedly* retweeting content that contains misplaced apostrophes<\/strong><br \/>\nLook, this really is very simple. If you are unable to correct misplaced apostrophes in tweets *before* you retweet, you either don&#8217;t care about the people who receive your mutilated content, or you&#8217;re a village idiot. If you repeatedly retweet content with misplaced apostrophes you will be considered to be the latter and, as a consequence, you will get unfollowed. Live with the judgement. Or improve your understanding of the English language.<\/p>\n<p>Or&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. You treat Twitter as if it was your personal SMS service<br \/>\n<\/strong>There is, admittedly, a line that falls between a public social network such as Twitter, and a private means of communication such as SMS. But it isn&#8217;t a difficult line to find. Most of us know where it is. You, apparently, do not. You have repeatedly used the wrong tool for the job. It&#8217;s the use of the word &#8216;repeatedly&#8217; there that you should pay attention to. We have all, at some stage or other, pushed out a tweet to a wider audience than it should have addressed. But working your way through your entire address book, sending &#8216;Merry Christmas&#8217; tweets to everyone you know (and therefore, sending those tweets to everyone in your timeline)? Do you really consider this is acceptable? Really?<\/p>\n<p>Or&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.\u00a0<strong>You are guilty of *repeatedly* retweeting content that contains the scandalous yet obvious misuse of your, you&#8217;re; too, two, to, or have committed any other crime against the English Language that even my 13-year old daughter knows better than to commit<\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>This is a black and white situation. You have within your power, the ability to MT not RT someone else&#8217;s content. This means you can edit and correct their grammar crime, and you can do this *before* you pass his\/her content on to the rest of the world. If you don&#8217;t &#8211; and once again, the use of the word &#8216;repeatedly&#8217; figures large in this &#8211; you will be unfollowed.<\/p>\n<p>And that, for now, is pretty much it.<\/p>\n<p>So if I&#8217;ve unfollowed you in the last few days, and you feel that the reason I may have unfollowed you isn&#8217;t in this little list, please feel free to add what you believe your crime may have been, to the comments below.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks.<\/p>\n<p>And&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Merry Christmas!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dear Twitter Friend. I have been following you for a while now.\u00a0It&#8217;s important to understand that I only follow people who I like; I only<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stuff","two-columns"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brennigjones.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}