If it was as easy as all that, we’d all be best-sellers, right?
In the writing world:
I’ve read excellent published work But I’ve also read excellent unpublished work! I’ve crit’d and reviewed writing which has gone on to become published when, frankly, it shouldn’t have made it out of the envelope, let alone made it out of the slush pile.
And I’ve crit’d and reviewed unpublished work that captured the imagination of the reader; it pulled one along, manipulated the reader through abstract imagery – and sometimes memories. It was so good that it penetrated the psyche of the reader and whispered, from inside the brain, this is you, this really is you. You could be here, you could be this person.
The ability to create this, to suspend all forms of disbelief is actually the most difficult thing for any writer to achieve in contemporary literary fiction. A first work has to be more than right, it has to do more than grab attention from the outset. It also has to maintain a high level of impulsion. It also has to be believable. Be real. Be honest. Be true.
Aye, it’s fair to say that I’ve read several unpublished works like this. Several that have been this good. So good in fact, yes so good that they made me want to go out in to the street, stop people at random, thrust a copy in their hands and yell at them ‘go home and read this, it’ll change the way you look at dentists (one unpublished novel) lunatic Welsh rabbit-keepers (another unpublished novel) or yourselves (both novels!) for the rest of your lives!‘
And do you know what my friends?
Those novels – and many, many more of similar quality – remain unpublished. They sit underneath the computer table, languishing in a cardboard box with a couple of other dusty memories. The author, sometimes, looking at the box, remembers what is in there and how long it took to complete – and what it took to complete in emotional terms – and remembering (once bitterly, but now with a massive sense of irony) the many rejection letters the novel gathered, whilst thinking of the reams of utter dross on the shelves of WH Smith.
But what’s a writer to do about it? The literary industry is tightly controlled.
So tightly controlled that a few years ago Iris Murdoch bravely submitted an unpublished novel under a pseudonym to every literary agent and – later – every publisher in the UK. Do you really need me to tell you that every single addressee rejected it?
So what is a writer to do about it?
Self-publish publish? It seems to be the growing trend.
On 1st November I shall be going to a book-launch in London; the official unveiling of the third chapter in the life of the young but oh so talented writer Sam Manicom. Sam has had this book – as were the previous two – published under his own name. He’s done the job of a literary agent and a publisher; the PR, marketing, sales, distribution, stock control and warehousing…
It seems incredible to me that Sam was unable to get what some might call a ‘normal’ book deal whilst (in the same genre) a television tie-in ostensibly written by (but I doubt it) those two charmless oafish buffoons Charley Boorman and Ewan McGregor appears on the shelves of Waterstones with zero effort and are yet produced with less than half of Sam’s ability. The truth is that more and more writers are turning to self-publishing these days – as a way of side-stepping the ancient monoliths that stand astride the literary world and turn a deaf ear to talent, whilst allowing the likes of Beckham, Jordan and Keegan (to name but three talentless scribblers) in to print.
In the music world:
And so it is in the world of music – it is much the same.
These days it seems that the only new artists getting record deals are chav princesses and winners of televised talent shows.
Because you can bang on the doors of record labels, you can stand outside radio stations, you can make appointments to see music agents, station managers and A&R men, but no matter what you’ve got to tell them… they’re just not listening.
Everyone – without exception – absolutely everyone who has heard the material I’ve put in front of their ears by The Razorbax has been hooked. But can I get someone in the music industry interested? Can I fuck. It occurs to me that if I had put three songs on a CD-R with a little artwork I could have called it an EP and sold about 50 copies.
That’s just around the office and people I know!
I’ll get back to The Razorbax in a minute.
This evening I met with a couple of guys from a (very) local radio station in South West London. The Razorbax isn’t their bag – I knew that before I went there. My objective this evening was something different.
I gave them a mini-disk with one complete and two edited tracks by Danny Rhymez and Matty B and, to be fair to the guys, they listened to it there and then. Afterwards they said they’d see – they’d think about it. But they can’t fool me, I saw the glint. The bad news is that this was one of the many pirate radio stations in this part of what we laughingly call our nation’s capital. So the lads aren’t going to get rich, no royalties in the pirate world. But they will get a play (or more!) – I’m sure of that. And maybe we can build on that. Maybe. Perhaps. Who knows?
But get the mainstream media to wake up to talent? That’s nigh on bloody impossible.
So for the last four or five days I’ve been researching a thing: pros and cons of setting up an indie record label.
Now hang on. I’m not for one instant saying that’s what I’m going to do. All I’m saying is that I’m researching it.
And the surprising thing?
Well, the truly surprising thing is how little record labels physically do for their slice of the royalty cake.
Oh sure, they have the contacts and they milk those contacts. It’s not exactly ‘payola’ but no-one can deny that there is a form of patronage between the record labels and the radio stations.
Another surprising thing my research into indie record labels has thrown up is the seemingly large number of bands who have formed their own labels.
Is this the musical version of self-publishing?
In terms of a business model, if an indie record label concentrated on relationship management, carefully cultivated high-level decision-makers instead of going for the ‘all or nothing scatter-gun’ approach…
And if an indie record label digitised the product then spent 50% of its effort marketing that digital product…
What would happen?
The business model would suggest that the budget would be divided between band (salaries and expenses), studio time, gig overheads, marketing/advertising, minimal overhead and digitising/distribution costs. Income from sales, gig receipts and (yes, I’m going to say it) merchandise would be the other half of the balance sheet.
Again, let’s clear up any misconceptions…
I know I am not going to spend my days, evenings and nights doing the gruntwork behind an indie record label.
I know this.
But I do know how to run a company. And market. And sell. And build business relationships. And exploit niche markets. And organise.
I’m a fucking MBA for crying out loud – graduated top of my class and won the Endeavour Trophy in to the bargain; that kind of stuff is second nature to me.
No, I couldn’t spend all day doing the grunt work – I am busy running my own company (and filling what’s left of my time with the competing priorities I have in my life).
But I could – in theory at least – set up a label, build the necessary frameworks for it to operate within, organise it, identify the markets, plan, make contacts with people, establish the relationships, build campaigns…
And I’d let someone with some time do the hard-nosed gruntwork. A 20-something on commission? Get one of those personable, attractive young chuggers off the street and give them a real challenge – but for a decent income.
I have learned that indie record labels don’t make big bucks but that’s OK. My business sense says the thing to do is structure the label like a ‘proper’ (i.e. non-media-based) organisation; salary-based draw-downs and then structure a proper cash-flow with planned milestones against a business and marketing plan.
Sigh.
You can see from this very small brain dump how much thought I’ve given the concept. But it is just a concept. It’s no more than a mental exercise at the moment. And what I’ve dumped here is just a tiny excerpt of how much mulling I’ve been giving the idea. So far – I’d estimate – I’ve put in about 50 hours of concentrated brain time. It needs another 50 – at least.
And more phone calls. And door knocking. But much more thinking.
One thought that’s constantly in my head though? That the day of the giant might be coming to a close.
B.
Good luck with getting your idea off the ground.
Starting a business, takes much more than 100 hours of brain work. Not that my business is writing or music, but it took me a year of getting from brain to paper to off the ground.
All worth it in the end though.
Great essay top marks 10/10 bravo!
I’m gonig ot have to disagree with you slightly Bren. Yes setting up an inde label would do all the things you are suggesting but with the rise of digital media and internet i don’t think that any type of record label in the traditional sense is a viable business option any more. The future is digital media, and you don’t need a record label to distribute music in that way.
Trixie: It’s just a mental exercise at the moment.
danny rhymez and matty b: It’s how I get my thinking out. I try to be
analstructured in my head.LizSara: Ummm, well now I’m going to have to disagree with you slightly. 🙂 As far as you’ve gone your argument is correct. Yes, digital media is the future. But digitising the music per se is not where the process ends. The lifecycle completes with the payment of royalties to the artist. And before that happens the generation of royalites occurs and the single selling point where income divided by cost minus effort equals sufficient net profit is… airplay. And airplay together with marketing are what labels do for their stable of artists.
The digital music world has thousands of artists who have gone as far as they can by themselves (hell, I play out about five different artists on the podcast every week).
These brilliant, capable, talented musicians have booked studio time, recorded and digitised their work and got it listed on emusic or iTunes, all of which is great!
But that doesn’t make their work sell; it doesn’t ‘get it out there’ in to the public consciousness. And I would argue that unless an artist has got sufficient expertise, time and energy then they’ll fall at that last – yet vital – fence, allowing audio spam to go on and get the airplay and then sell hundreds of thousands of copies and spend 35,000 weeks at number one in the charts like Rhianna’s Umbrella. How many good good digital releases came in to the world at the same time as Umbrella was released – but failed to make it because no-one was there to complete the product lifecycle? It’s unanswerable but I’d estimate the quantity to be in the hundreds bracket.
Aside from the business logic, yes, I completely agree that digital media is the way forward. However my preference is to shy away from iTunes. I prefer to use eMusic or CD Baby because I want my stuff to be DRM-free. I mean, if I’ve bought it I actually want to own it, not rent it on some peculiar ‘permissions’ basis – how wacky is that concept?
I thought iTunes had already gone DRM free…
from participating music labels.
And for a premium fee.
Brennig Jones
When he rides horses he moans
Cos he’s sexually excited
Like when I screamed from Reading that book he writed
What were the 3 tracks you put on mini disky wisky woo woo brenny boo boo woo woo?
And what was the station? Coz like danny rhymes and the matty bee bee boo used to b pirates. Aaaaaaargh!!!!
Also Mon frere, what’s the name of your new record label?
Rapist records? A bit like virgin but more desicive.
Bmi? Brennigs music indie
Or danny rhymes and matty b rule, the razorbacks are nearly as good?
Well me boyos me buckos me hearties me lovelies… them three tracks would be See Me and Show Me and the iconoclasticly ironic (in a post modern kind of way) Religion is Gay. Because them’s three of the four un-DRM’d tracks I have of yours, aharrrr.
And the pirates would be Rooftops, from down Brixton/Streatham way, aharrrr, ’tis so. Arrrrr.
And there is no name because there is no label. There is a concept which has been added to the pile of other shit that I think about when I’m not sleeping. It may stay there, it may not. We’ll see. Arrrrr.
AAAAARRR ME HEARTIEEE!!!!
brennig jones bones microphones.
it’s 45 minutes on zee train to waterloo from the coolest town know to man (amazingstoke).
we have the largest statue of a penis in the country, slap bang in the middle of our shopping centre. ( and im not the ginger bloke in the pic, im a lot of things, but im not ginger. thank god!.
http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/images/elewis/2005/10/16/rscn1281.jpg
i owe you a pint or two. Me and Dan will come and bum you sometime, we’ll bring a non drm’d cd and give you back your 7.99,
that you wasted on itunes, fuck steve jobs
ps,
the razorspacks are average, i think that if you stopped wasting time on them and concentrated on us properly, we’d have a serious chance of turing this gay bum bum industry around, ( i’m only joking, the razor backs do sound slightly original)
i’m not going to tell you to start a record label here, as that would be inapropiate. but i will when ive got off that train in waterloo, and thoses razorbacks better not be there, coz i’ fucking cunt them!
night night
x