I-ve just left a meeting in New Scotland Yard.
When I arrived – two hours ago, there were two television crews (full outside broadcasting units) standing outside on the pavement; set up with cameras on tripods, microphones that looked like fluffy dachshunds and small ancillary lighting units. And a cameraman and a sound technician.
Two hours later and guess what’s outside?
Yep, two television crews, cameras on tripods, microphones that look like fluffy dachshunds and small ancillary lighting units. And a cameraman and a sound technician.
WTF?
Don’t television news companies have more creative ways of spending their budget?
You know that all you’re going to get will be a ‘talking to camera’ piece where the studio anchor asks inane questions of a very cold looking person who is standing outside a building’.
And this small point really gets me.
BBC News (or whoever, the precise name of the production company is not important – it’s the principle of the thing that I’m questioning) sends out an OB unit with a presenter to stand in front of a closed doorway or a sign that says ‘Department of…’ so that someone back in the studio can ask the most inane questions in a 30-second ‘to camera’ piece.
What?
Why?
And…
For how much?
B.
Lots of money. And lots and lots.
And the case of Pravda, all covered by the unique way they’re funded.
And lots.
D
silly television people. I see them standing out in the rain during a hurricane reporting live and I feel better about working for a newspaper.